OKLOAurora+15MW.SMRSMRVOYGR+77MW.NuScaleNNENano Nuclear+Micro.ReactorLTBRLightbridge+Fuel.TechLEUCentrus+HALEU.ProdCCJCameco+Uranium.SupplyUECUranium Energy+U3O8.MiningCEGConstellation+TMI.RestartGEVGE Vernova+BWRX-300BWXBWXT+TRISO.FuelFUND.YTD2025-26$2.5B+.Raised
Home/Natrium vs BWRX-300 vs Xe-100
SMR COMPARISON // HEAD-TO-HEAD ANALYSIS

TerraPower Natrium vs BWRX-300 vs Xe-100: Leading US SMRs Compared

Three reactors are leading the US small modular reactor race in 2026, each representing a fundamentally different technology pathway. TerraPower's Natrium is a 345 MWe sodium-cooled fast reactor with integrated molten salt energy storage, backed by Bill Gates and a $4B DOE cost-share. GE Hitachi's BWRX-300 is a 300 MWe simplified boiling water reactor already under construction at OPG Darlington in Ontario. X-energy's Xe-100 is an 80 MWe helium-cooled high-temperature gas reactor using TRISO pebble fuel, with Amazon backing up to 12 units. This page compares their specifications, NRC status, cost estimates, timelines, and commercial partnerships to answer the question: which SMR will define the next era of nuclear power?

3 Reactors Compared
3 Technology Types
725 MWe Combined Capacity
2029-2030 Target Online
Last updated: March 2026 · All Reactor Specs →

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON

SPECIFICATIONNATRIUMBWRX-300XE-100
DeveloperTerraPowerGE Hitachi / GE VernovaX-energy
Electrical Output345 MWe300 MWe80 MWe
Thermal Output840 MWth870 MWth200 MWth
Reactor TypeSFRBWRHTGR
CoolantLiquid sodiumLight waterHelium
Fuel TypeHALEU metallicLEU UO2TRISO pebble
EnrichmentHALEU (5-20%)<5% LEUHALEU (5-20%)
Modules Per Plant114
Construction Timeline60 months48 months48 months
NRC / Regulatory StatusNRC Construction Permit Received (March 2026)CNSC Licence to Construct (April 2025)NRC CP Application Under Review
Target First Operation203020292030
Passive SafetyYesYesYes
Load FollowingYesYesYes
CountryUSAUSAUSA
StatusUnder ConstructionUnder ConstructionIn Licensing

COMMERCIAL PARTNERSHIPS & DEPLOYMENT

NatriumTerraPower
Meta · Up to 8 plants (2.8 GW), 2032-2035
DOE · $2B cost-share for Kemmerer, WY lead plant
PacifiCorp · Host utility for Kemmerer site
BWRX-300GE Hitachi / GE Vernova
OPG · Lead project at Darlington, Ontario (2029)
TVA · Clinch River, Tennessee deployment
SaskPower · Saskatchewan, Canada fleet deployment
Fermi Energia · Estonia deployment planned
Xe-100X-energy
Amazon · Up to 12 units, Cascade facility via Energy Northwest
Dow · 4 units at Seadrift, TX industrial site
DOE · ARDP award up to $1.2B
Ares Management · Nasdaq listing sponsor ($530M+ raise)

REACTOR PROFILES

Natrium
345 MWeSFR2030
TerraPower · Liquid sodium · HALEU metallic · HALEU (5-20%)

Founded by Bill Gates. 345 MWe baseload with 500 MWe peak via molten salt energy storage. Lead project in Kemmerer, Wyoming — first utility-scale advanced nuclear plant in US. DOE cost-share up to $2B of $4B total. Meta deal for up to 8 plants (2.8 GW).

BWRX-300
300 MWeBWR2029
GE Hitachi / GE Vernova · Light water · LEU UO2 · <5% LEU

Simplified boiling water reactor with natural circulation. Lead project at OPG Darlington, Ontario — first SMR construction in North America. Construction began May 2025.

Xe-100
80 MWeHTGR2030
X-energy · Helium · TRISO pebble · HALEU (5-20%)

80 MWe per module, 4-pack configuration yields 320 MWe. TRISO-X fuel facility (TX-1) NRC licensed Feb 2026. Dow Seadrift project: 4 units. Amazon/Energy Northwest: up to 12 units at Cascade facility. DOE ARDP award up to $1.2B.

BOTTOM LINE

Each reactor serves a different market. The BWRX-300 is the lowest-risk path to deployment — it uses proven light water technology, conventional LEU fuel with no HALEU dependency, and is already under construction at Darlington. It will likely be the first operating SMR in North America. Natrium is the highest-ambition design — a Generation IV sodium-cooled fast reactor with integrated energy storage, backed by Meta's 2.8 GW commitment and a $4B first-of-a-kind plant in Wyoming. If it works, it redefines nuclear economics; but it faces HALEU fuel supply risk and first-of-a-kind construction risk. The Xe-100 occupies the middle ground — a modular, factory-fabricated HTGR using TRISO fuel that cannot melt, with Amazon and Dow as anchor customers. Its 80 MWe module size enables incremental deployment. For investors, BWRX-300 exposure comes via GE Vernova (GEV). TerraPower and X-energy are not publicly traded. The technology that wins will be the one that delivers on schedule and on budget — and right now, BWRX-300 leads that race.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

RELATED INTELLIGENCE

SMR Cost Per kWh: Complete Economics GuideHALEU Fuel Explained: The Nuclear Fuel BottleneckEvery SMR Company: The Complete Directory